Hello john dane
Do u know any one in the enviromental chamber business with good moral's?
tom bannash bragged U guy were stupid and would believe any lies he said, and bragged at what a back stabber he was..
He said U were just like him..! AND IT'S OK TO BE CURRUPT
Dean tripp said .. TB .. was a dishonest lierand thief when he worked with U.. is that true?
HIl sysbesma told me he has the same problem as tom bannash..
(can u figure it out?)
and Fred Plont.. said U are just like him,, and he brags at what a liar and embezzler he is..
and he didn't need to work for ENSECO for randy BUNn .. and make the BIG money in the union.. because he only worked 3 or 4 hours a day and charged thermotron for 8 to 12 hours a day..
MITCH kerr.. bragged to me that he believes what ever lies these perverts say..
and that they were BACK stabbing me.. WOW .. mitch is a heck of a guy....
it's no wonder that fred plont and others call mitch ..."mitch the MORON.. and the IDOIT follower...
WELL mitch told me he told tom bannash that he was going to "make more money then TB"
WOW i am sure that kept tom bannash up at night!!
Because .. bragged u guys would believe any of his lies..
it's not about the money .. it about the lies..
Fred said ..mitch and john are his "FRIENDS"
but ..."BUSINESS IS BUSINESS" besides they "think" they are better than other people.!!
TOM PATTERSON .. seems to be the only man i worked with that admits that his job was to lie and cheat deceive and defraud his co-worker
When i talked to randy Bunn.. before he went out of business.. i was surprised to lear the different lies he believed..
and because he and his father didn't hire .. QUALIFIED employees .. it was no surprise that he went out of business..
as i told him.. thermotron required and encouraged their people to lie to each other and steal and embezzle..
FIND A pet at thermotron and u locate an embezzler and a liar
thanks.. PPP
moral degeneration
moral degeneration
As we said before, Satanism is much more than being hooded in a coven during a Full Moon ceremony.
Satanism is encouraging indulgence in all matters of the flesh, as we have already shown. Once you understand the truth that today's America is encouraging indulgence in all matters of the flesh, you will understand that we are already prepared to accept Antichrist.
Now, we can understand the sentiment uttered above, by a college senior,
that the "President's sex life is none of our business",
or that sentiment uttered by another,
who said that the President's sex life is "irrelevant to performing his job".
What this tells you is that these people have the same
Satanic personal values as does President Clinton.
Since so many Americans apparently share this value system,
the "sheep are ready to shear", i.e., the American people are ready to be enslaved under Antichrist.
I think you have gotten the point by now. America has changed her formerly Christian values to Satanic ones, without any one understanding what has happened.
But, now that you know, can you see that President Clinton is merely acting out in his life, in his body, the normal inclinations for any good Satanist?
And, can you see that those people who think what he is doing is "normal",
or who excuse it in any way, or who express their desire to sleep with the President, are also subscribing to Satanism?
Monday, June 30, 2008
Wednesday, June 18, 2008
Characteristics of Gossip
John Wayne Gacy was a smart businessman
Characteristics of Gossip
When researchers study gossip, they don't all use the same definition. Most start with the same basic idea: Gossip is a conversation between two people that concerns a third person who is not present.
Different researchers then add a range of stipulations, such as:
The conversation takes place in private.
The people talking are transmitting information as though it were fact, but they have not confirmed the information as factual.
The people gossiping and the person being gossiped about know each other in real life.
By this definition, celebrity gossip is not really gossip unless the speaker and the listener are friends with the celebrity in question.
Something in the speaker's body language or tone of voice suggests a moral judgment about the information being relayed. For example, the sentence "Clara got a puppy" sounds pretty neutral. But if Clara lives in a college dorm that doesn't allow pets and the person speaking sounds scandalized, the sentence becomes gossip.
The people gossiping compare themselves in some way to the person being gossiped about, usually considering themselves to be superior to the subject.
For the purpose of this article, we'll use a fairly basic definition. When two people talk about a third, absent person and the conversation includes undertones of judgment or secrecy, it's gossip. We'll look at some of the basics of how gossip governs social groups next.
Gossip vs. Rumor
Rumors and gossip have similarly distasteful connotations, but researchers disagree about whether they are the same thing. Here's a rundown of different views on gossip and rumor:
They're the same.
Rumor is a specific type of gossip.
Gossip is based in fact, but rumors are based in hypotheses.
Gossip is a tool for maintaining social order, but rumor is a tool for explaining things that people do not understand.
Gossip relates something people believe has happened, but rumors express what people hope or fear will happen.
Gossip's Bad Reputation
Gossip has a pretty bad reputation. Nearly every major world religion cautions against gossiping and spreading rumors.
For example, the book of Leviticus, found in the Christian Bible and the Jewish Torah, states, "Thou shalt not go up and down as a tale-bearer among thy people" [ref].
\
Gossip is also contrary to the concept of right speech, which is part of the Eightfold Path to enlightenment that is central to Buddhism.
Many Islamic texts forbid both speaking and listening to gossip [ref].
In general, the secular world looks down on gossip as well.
Parents, self-help books and counselors caution people to avoid gossip. Books on business management present gossip as a threat to an organization's health and stability because it decreases morale and wastes employees' time.
The Ethics of Gossip
Delicate Information
Jason is suddenly terminated from his job. His co-workers begin to worry about their own job security -- Jason was well-liked and efficient, and his being fired came out of the blue. Morale begins to suffer as people wonder whether they will be next. Soon, people learn through the office grapevine that Jason had been stealing money from the company's charity fund drive, which he was coordinating.
Jason's co-workers need this information to feel secure in their own jobs, but it would not be appropriate for the company to broadcast it. In this kind of situation, a company's official sources of information can't answer employees' questions, so the employees turn to unofficial sources. For this reason, gossip is often prevalent in businesses that do not communicate well with their employees.
Spreading this information could be considered a violation of Jason's privacy or an assault on his character. In addition, it can be argued that people's confidence in Jason is more important than their sense of job security.
This example also demonstrates something that's typical of a lot of gossip. Most people would probably react to the news of Jason's theft with disbelief. However, everyone trusts that the source of the information is telling the truth -- they suspend their disbelief. Although the idea that someone as kind and responsible as Jason could be a thief can seem absurd, people will pass it on if they believe it to be true.
Being Prepared
Amanda lives in an apartment. One night, someone breaks into the apartment upstairs. Amanda learns that her upstairs neighbors were drug dealers and had recently been arrested. Her landlord evicted the neighbors, but they'd left most of their possessions in the apartment. Police theorize that the thief had bought drugs from the neighbors and had broken in looking for drugs or money.
Amanda is surprised, since she thought her neighborhood was a safe one. Her landlords clean out the upstairs apartment and rent it to a family who has a young daughter. Concerned for their safety, Amanda tells her new neighbors about the previous neighbors and the break-in.
Most people think of gossip as negative, but in this situation, Amanda could feel morally obligated to gossip. She's giving her neighbors information that they need to have to ensure their physical safety.
She and her neighbors also develop a bond of trust during the conversation, which can make it more likely that they will be able to trust and help each other in the future.
As these examples show, gossip and rumors have some similarities to urban legends. All three can make people aware of typically unspoken social rules and offer a warning of what could happen if the rules are disobeyed.
Gossip and urban legends can also take on a life of their own, spreading far beyond the social circle in which they originated.
Finally, people often adamantly believe rumors and urban legends they hear, in spite of evidence that they are not true.
Tuesday, June 17, 2008
criminal psychopaths enjoy other peoples fear
at thermotron i was taught to be a liar, thief, and embezzler..
and that every-one is the manager..
the customer is just a chump.. to take advantage of..
insert a straw into his brain and suck until his his head caves in..!
Do criminal psychopaths enjoy other peoples fear or just not notice it?by Julia Layton
PrintEmailCiteShareDigg This
Yahoo! Buzz
StumbleUpon
del.icio.us
RedditCite This!Close
Please copy/paste the following text to properly cite this How Stuff Works article:
Layton, Julia.
"Do criminal psychopaths enjoy other peoples fear or just not notice it?."
07 December 2006. HowStuffWorks.com.
17 June 2008.Most Evil: John Wayne Gacy
More People Videos »
Close
Most Evil: John Wayne Gacy
John Wayne Gacy was a smart businessman, admired by friends and neighbors, but nobody knew the vicious killer who hid behind the mask of a clown. Learn more about serial killers in this video from Discovery (March 28) More People Videos
More Investigation Discovery Videos
Take the Quiz
Think you're an expert on Ted Bundy? Test your knowledge with this quiz from Investigation Discovery:
Ted Bundy quiz
December 7, 2006
When most of us think of killers like Ted Bundy or John Wayne Gacy, we imagine people who feel compelled to harm other human beings, who enjoy causing fear and who feel no remorse for their actions. And for the most part, these characterizations are entirely correct.
Serial killers (and many other types of violent criminals) are typically considered to be psychopaths with aggressive and anti-social characteristics. But not all psychopaths are violent -- some are "merely" manipulative, dishonest and incapable of experiencing deep emotions, and they may blend in with society with relative ease.
A CEO who cheats his employees out of their pensions and then walks off without a tinge of regret may be a psychopath.
Psychopaths, violent or non-violent, have no "moral compass," no conscience.
They do not experience feelings of guilt for the crimes or betrayals they commit.
A recent study of the brains of psychopaths, published in the British Journal of Psychiatry, may shed some light on what's going on -- or not going on -- in these people's heads.
For years, researchers and psychiatrists have understood that psychopaths respond differently to external stimuli, and they have theorized that this abnormal response is rooted in the brain.
The idea is that psychopaths process information differently than non-psychopaths, and numerous scientific studies using functional MRI (fMRI) to visualize brain activity have backed this up.
In 2003, a study presented at a conference in Britain showed that when "normal" people lie, there is increased activity in the frontal lobe that suggests the experience of guilt and discomfort; but when psychopaths lie, there is no increased brain activity.
An earlier study found that when psychopaths viewed emotionally charged words like "rape" or "murder," the changes in their brain activity were completely different from the changes that occurred when non-psychopaths saw those words.
The increased brain activity in the psychopaths wasn't even in the limbic system, which is where language processing occurs.
In 2006, a group of London-based scientists published the results of a study that may offer additional information on the biological basis for psychopathy. It appears that psychopaths may experience the signs of fear in other people in a way that is not comparable to the way most of us experience it. In fact, they may not really experience it at all.
AP Photo/Mark Foley
Ted Bundy, executed in January 1989 for the savage murders of at least 16 women
The study set out to test the idea that psychopaths don't experience empathy for other people's distress -- can't understand, sense or appropriately react to it -- because they don't grasp the signs of that distress. In particular, this study tested the responses of nine "normal" people and six criminal psychopaths to typical facial and vocal signs of fear and sadness.
All of the subjects were hooked up fMRI equipment that measured their neurological responses to the stimuli. In this context, "response" typically means increased bloodflow and/or increased firing of neurons, the carriers of brain signals.
The researchers showed both groups of subjects two different sets of images: one of joyful faces and neutral faces, and one of fearful faces and neutral faces. The neutral faces established a baseline for brain activity.
When the non-psychopathic subjects saw a happy face, the fusiform and extrastriate regions of the brain -- the areas primarily responsible for processing images of facial expressions -- showed increased activity compared to their response to a neutral face. The psychopathic brains also showed increased activity in response to the happy faces, although less of an increase than in the non-psychopathic group.
However, whereas the non-psychopathic subjects showed a similar increase in brain activity in response to the distressed faces, the psychopathic subjects did not. In fact, when the psychopaths were shown sad or fearful faces, their brain scans actually showed less neural activity than when they were shown neutral faces.
The researchers concluded that in psychopaths, the neural pathways that are supposed to process signs of human distress are either non-functional or work completely differently than those pathways work in the general population.
This could explain, at least in part, why psychopaths do not identify with the emotional distress of their victims. The findings of the study may be helpful in understanding how psychopathy works at the neurological level, but in a BBC News article, psychopathy researcher Dr. Nicola Gray of Cardiff University explains, "it is still a long way to finding out what to do about that."
For more information on psychopathy, abnormal psychiatry and related topics, check out the following links:
and that every-one is the manager..
the customer is just a chump.. to take advantage of..
insert a straw into his brain and suck until his his head caves in..!
Do criminal psychopaths enjoy other peoples fear or just not notice it?by Julia Layton
PrintEmailCiteShareDigg This
Yahoo! Buzz
StumbleUpon
del.icio.us
RedditCite This!Close
Please copy/paste the following text to properly cite this How Stuff Works article:
Layton, Julia.
"Do criminal psychopaths enjoy other peoples fear or just not notice it?."
07 December 2006. HowStuffWorks.com.
17 June 2008.Most Evil: John Wayne Gacy
More People Videos »
Close
Most Evil: John Wayne Gacy
John Wayne Gacy was a smart businessman, admired by friends and neighbors, but nobody knew the vicious killer who hid behind the mask of a clown. Learn more about serial killers in this video from Discovery (March 28) More People Videos
More Investigation Discovery Videos
Take the Quiz
Think you're an expert on Ted Bundy? Test your knowledge with this quiz from Investigation Discovery:
Ted Bundy quiz
December 7, 2006
When most of us think of killers like Ted Bundy or John Wayne Gacy, we imagine people who feel compelled to harm other human beings, who enjoy causing fear and who feel no remorse for their actions. And for the most part, these characterizations are entirely correct.
Serial killers (and many other types of violent criminals) are typically considered to be psychopaths with aggressive and anti-social characteristics. But not all psychopaths are violent -- some are "merely" manipulative, dishonest and incapable of experiencing deep emotions, and they may blend in with society with relative ease.
A CEO who cheats his employees out of their pensions and then walks off without a tinge of regret may be a psychopath.
Psychopaths, violent or non-violent, have no "moral compass," no conscience.
They do not experience feelings of guilt for the crimes or betrayals they commit.
A recent study of the brains of psychopaths, published in the British Journal of Psychiatry, may shed some light on what's going on -- or not going on -- in these people's heads.
For years, researchers and psychiatrists have understood that psychopaths respond differently to external stimuli, and they have theorized that this abnormal response is rooted in the brain.
The idea is that psychopaths process information differently than non-psychopaths, and numerous scientific studies using functional MRI (fMRI) to visualize brain activity have backed this up.
In 2003, a study presented at a conference in Britain showed that when "normal" people lie, there is increased activity in the frontal lobe that suggests the experience of guilt and discomfort; but when psychopaths lie, there is no increased brain activity.
An earlier study found that when psychopaths viewed emotionally charged words like "rape" or "murder," the changes in their brain activity were completely different from the changes that occurred when non-psychopaths saw those words.
The increased brain activity in the psychopaths wasn't even in the limbic system, which is where language processing occurs.
In 2006, a group of London-based scientists published the results of a study that may offer additional information on the biological basis for psychopathy. It appears that psychopaths may experience the signs of fear in other people in a way that is not comparable to the way most of us experience it. In fact, they may not really experience it at all.
AP Photo/Mark Foley
Ted Bundy, executed in January 1989 for the savage murders of at least 16 women
The study set out to test the idea that psychopaths don't experience empathy for other people's distress -- can't understand, sense or appropriately react to it -- because they don't grasp the signs of that distress. In particular, this study tested the responses of nine "normal" people and six criminal psychopaths to typical facial and vocal signs of fear and sadness.
All of the subjects were hooked up fMRI equipment that measured their neurological responses to the stimuli. In this context, "response" typically means increased bloodflow and/or increased firing of neurons, the carriers of brain signals.
The researchers showed both groups of subjects two different sets of images: one of joyful faces and neutral faces, and one of fearful faces and neutral faces. The neutral faces established a baseline for brain activity.
When the non-psychopathic subjects saw a happy face, the fusiform and extrastriate regions of the brain -- the areas primarily responsible for processing images of facial expressions -- showed increased activity compared to their response to a neutral face. The psychopathic brains also showed increased activity in response to the happy faces, although less of an increase than in the non-psychopathic group.
However, whereas the non-psychopathic subjects showed a similar increase in brain activity in response to the distressed faces, the psychopathic subjects did not. In fact, when the psychopaths were shown sad or fearful faces, their brain scans actually showed less neural activity than when they were shown neutral faces.
The researchers concluded that in psychopaths, the neural pathways that are supposed to process signs of human distress are either non-functional or work completely differently than those pathways work in the general population.
This could explain, at least in part, why psychopaths do not identify with the emotional distress of their victims. The findings of the study may be helpful in understanding how psychopathy works at the neurological level, but in a BBC News article, psychopathy researcher Dr. Nicola Gray of Cardiff University explains, "it is still a long way to finding out what to do about that."
For more information on psychopathy, abnormal psychiatry and related topics, check out the following links:
Tuesday, June 3, 2008
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)